Archaeologists and conservationists around the world are voicing outrage this week over Egypt’s controversial restoration project on the pyramid of Menkaure, the smallest of the three large pyramids in Giza. The renovation, which involves encasing portions of the 4500-year-old pyramid in new granite, has sparked accusations of irreparable damage to the ancient structure.
Background on the Menkaure Pyramid
The pyramid of Menkaure dates back to approximately 2530 BC during Egypt’s Old Kingdom era. Built as a tomb for the pharaoh Menkaure, it originally stood 216 feet (65 meters) tall and was encased in smooth granite and limestone. Over millennia, the casing stones were removed or destroyed, leaving the pyramid’s inner core exposed.
By the early 20th century, only a small amount of the original casing remained near the pyramid’s base. In the 1990s and early 2000s, restoration efforts re-covered sections of the base with new stones. The current controversial project aims to encase the entire lower half of the pyramid with new granite blocks.
|216 feet (65 meters)
|Base Length (1 side)
|335 feet (102 meters)
|Angle of Incline
|51 degrees, 20 minutes
Details of the Renovation Project
According to Egypt’s Ministry of Antiquities, the restoration will use 6,000 tons of granite to cover the bottom 33 feet (10 meters) of the pyramid’s base. The $6.6 million project is scheduled for completion by year’s end. Its goals are to restore stability, protect interior structures from weathering and external threats, and regain the pyramid’s original royal facade.
Engineers with the project have stated that modern technology will allow the new granite blocks to be shaped precisely for proper fit. Additionally, a mortar mixture will secure the new stones and fill gaps between blocks.
Critics counter that encasing monuments in new stone damages the original materials and obscures the historical construction techniques used. They argue the pyramid should be preserved as found today, with visible indications of passage of time.
Archaeologists Voice Sharp Criticism
The announcement of the restoration project in late January was met almost immediately with a chorus of criticism from archaeologists and antiquities experts around the world.
Zahi Hawass, Egypt’s former Minister of Antiquities, called the plan a “crime against the pyramids.” He expressed hope that international pressure would force authorities to halt the project.
Tarek Tawfik, former director of the Grand Egyptian Museum, wrote that proper restoration should focus on strengthening unstable areas while changing the historical face as little as possible.
The International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS) described the encasement as “irreversible damage.” ICOMOS monitors cultural heritage sites on UNESCO’s World Heritage List, which includes the Giza pyramids.
Additionally, over 3,000 Egyptians have signed an online petition against granite facades for ancient monuments. The petition calls for increased oversight and updated regulations regarding restoration practices.
Impact on Tourism and Public Perception
The pyramids of Giza are Egypt’s most iconic monuments and the primary destination for most tourists. The site saw nearly 10 million visitors in 2023, providing crucial economic contributions.
Authorities likely initiated the renovation project partly to bolster tourism revenue. However, the intense backlash may negatively impact public opinion and visitation numbers. It also highlights the difficulty of balancing modernization and development goals against preserving cultural heritage sites.
Some critics allege financial motivations have overtaken ethical considerations regarding Egypt’s ancient structures. Hawass and others argue for increased involvement by international experts regarding major projects at World Heritage sites.
What Happens Next?
In response to the widespread criticism, some Egyptian archaeologists have defended the project as an acceptable method for protecting and improving access to ancient monuments. However, the majority opinion leans heavily against the granite encasement of Egypt’s legendary pyramids.
- Will the renovation continue as planned until completing the new lower facade by year’s end?
- Will authorities bow to international pressure and walk back the restoration goals?
- Might they compromise by reducing the height or scope initially proposed for granite cladding?
The answers remain unclear for now. But the Menkaure pyramid has shone light on the complex debate around refurbishing historic structures versus preserving their age and imperfections. The coming months will determine whether the outcry succeeds in altering the course of the pyramid’s reconstruction.
To err is human, but AI does it too. Whilst factual data is used in the production of these articles, the content is written entirely by AI. Double check any facts you intend to rely on with another source.