June 23, 2024

Philips Reaches Agreement with FDA to Halt Sales of Sleep Apnea Devices in US

Written by AiBot

AiBot scans breaking news and distills multiple news articles into a concise, easy-to-understand summary which reads just like a news story, saving users time while keeping them well-informed.

Jan 30, 2024

Medical device maker Philips has reached an agreement with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to suspend sales and distribution of its sleep and respiratory care devices, including CPAP machines used to treat sleep apnea, in the United States. This comes after Philips issued massive recalls over the past two years of devices containing contaminated foam that puts users at risk of inhaling toxic gases.

Background of the Recall Crisis

In June 2021, Philips initially announced a voluntary recall of millions of its CPAP, BiPAP, and ventilator devices citing potential health risks from degraded sound-abdampening foam used in the devices. The foam is suspected to break down into particles that enter the device’s air pathway and be ingested or inhaled by users. The foam breakdown can also release volatile organic compounds (VOCs) into the air pathway.

This has sparked over 6000 lawsuits alleging the recalled devices have led to headaches, irritation, inflammation, respiratory issues, and even cancer for patients. However, Philips has been criticized over its slow pace of repairs and replacements, with some patients waiting over a year into 2023 with seemingly no end in sight.

Philips set aside over $885 million for the recall expenses, which later ballooned to billions of dollars. The company has had difficulty acquiring replacement parts and materials to fix all affected devices. This has significantly eroded Philips’ profits and reputation while patients urgently wait for solutions.

Details of FDA Agreement Halting Further Sales

On January 28, 2023 Philips announced reaching an agreement with the FDA on a consent decree that certifies Philips has established sufficient corrective actions to resume manufacturing certain sleep and respiratory care devices for markets outside the US.

However, the consent decree prohibits Philips from producing or distributing these devices within the US until it can demonstrate to the FDA that its quality system processes and procedures meet the FDA’s Quality System Regulation requirements. This is a strong action by the FDA to enforce corrections by Philips to ensure patient safety amidst harsh criticism of Philips’ poor handling of the massive recall.

Key details of Philips’ agreement with the FDA:

  • Philips will suspend the production and distribution of CPAP, BiPAP and mechanical ventilator devices for treating sleep apnea and respiratory conditions in the US market only
  • Does not affect markets outside the US at this time
  • Philips may continue servicing devices for patients currently prescribed their sleep devices in the US
  • Prohibits making or distributing any new sleep/respiratory devices in the US until Philips’ methods are certified by FDA auditors to fully comply with safety regulations
  • Came alongside Philips reporting Q4 2022 losses of $230 million, with a total 2022 net loss of $1.54 billion predominantly due to recall expenses
  • Philips set aside additional provisions of $293 million in Q4 2022 for the recall

This will surely have material impact on Philips’ bottom line from being unable to sell these products in the US until passing rigorous FDA auditing. But the priority is correcting systemic issues to better protect patient safety.

Financial Impact 2022
Recall expenses booked by Philips $3.324 billion
Additional Q4 2022 provisions $293 million
Total FY 2022 net loss $1.54 billion

What Comes Next With Future Sales in the US

By agreeing to the FDA consent decree, Philips must now complete three actions before resuming production and sales of these devices in the US:

1. Inspection of Documentation

Philips must provide extensive documentation to the FDA detailing corrections made to quality systems and manufacturing processes for review and inspection.

This includes current operating procedures, software validation, pre-production device testing, supplier contracts and oversight, standard operating procedures for receiving and investigating complaints, among others areas.

2. Site Inspection

The FDA must physically inspect the Philips sites that will manufacture these devices to ensure first-hand that all corrections and protocols have been implemented. This will likely occur at Philips’ main US factory in Murrysville, Pennsylvania where the majority of their sleep devices sold worldwide are produced.

Inspectors will audit if robust quality system processes meeting FDA guidelines have been fully adopted in the actual production environments. This includes scrutiny of supplier oversight, handling of defective materials, standardized instructions for assembling devices properly, equipment calibration logs, software validation records, and much more.

3. Demonstrate Sustained Compliance

Philips won’t fully clear the consent decree until demonstrating through independent audits and inspections that improved quality systems have been maintained consistently over an agreed upon period.

The FDA wants to see strong processes lasting at least several months – not temporary or superficial changes. This sustainable culture shift satisfies intent of the consent decree for long-term patient safety.

Successfully meeting these mandated steps to the FDA’s high standards will then allow Philips to start legally producing and selling their critical sleep/respiratory devices again in the US market. Realistically this may take many months at minimum before Philips can resume domestic sales.

In the meantime, Philips may continue supporting existing patients still using their devices in the US through servicing programs. However no new units can be sold domestically until fully clearing the clauses of this legally binding consent decree.

What This Means For Sleep Apnea Patients Reliant on These Devices‌

There is understandable frustration for the millions of sleep apnea patients in the US dependent on these Philips devices waiting through extreme delays to secure safe replacement units. This enforcement from the FDA will extend delays even longer for those seeking new sleep devices from Philips specifically.

Many patients can no longer tolerate using recalled Philips units putting them at risk, and they may not have reasonable access to equivalent non-Philips devices available sooner. This kicks the can down the road for their predicament.

While inconvenient to users in the short term, this FDA action was necessary to compel Philips to truly implement systemic changes that prevent lax quality standards that caused this crisis in the first place.

Class action lawsuits alleging coverups by Philips about known foam degradation issues years before recalls will continue pressuring responsibilities. Though Philips stresses prohibiting US sales is “not related to new facts or clinical safety insights”.

Philips does expect alternative sleep device availability to keep improving independent of their production issues. But realistically supply cannot increase fast enough to fulfill current demand if Philips remains sidelined for a while.

The bottom line is that sleep apnea patients requiring these life-improving breathing devices could face difficult tradeoffs managing their care based on further delays securing replacements. Their health and wellbeing depends on it.

Hopefully the strengthened safety reforms imposed on Philips through the legally binding FDA consent decree will set consistent expectations and best practices across all medical device manufacturers serving sensitive patient populations.

This scrutiny on industry shortcomings ultimately aims to raise accountability and restore public assurance in vital health technologies people trust their lives with daily. If the FDA approval process regains esteem and scientific rigor across the board, that is a win for consumers dependent on the integrity of the system overseeing their safety.




AiBot scans breaking news and distills multiple news articles into a concise, easy-to-understand summary which reads just like a news story, saving users time while keeping them well-informed.

To err is human, but AI does it too. Whilst factual data is used in the production of these articles, the content is written entirely by AI. Double check any facts you intend to rely on with another source.

By AiBot

AiBot scans breaking news and distills multiple news articles into a concise, easy-to-understand summary which reads just like a news story, saving users time while keeping them well-informed.

Related Post