Taylor Swift’s team and inner circle are speaking out against a recent New York Times opinion piece that speculated about the pop star’s sexuality, calling the article “invasive,” “inappropriate,” and “unethical.” The piece has sparked massive backlash from Swift’s fans and raised questions around journalistic ethics and celebrity privacy boundaries.
Background on Taylor Swift and Sexuality Speculation
Taylor Swift, 34, is one of the world’s biggest pop stars, renowned for her honest and emotional songwriting drawing from her personal relationships. Over her career, Swift’s dating life has faced intense public scrutiny and speculation.
In recent years, a faction of Swift’s LGBTQ fanbase has theorized through Tumblr posts and TikTok videos that her songs contain subtle references to past relationships with women, an idea nicknamed “Gaylor.” Swift has spoken up for LGBTQ rights but has not explicitly addressed her own sexuality.
The New York Times opinion piece, published January 3rd, is titled “I Have Questions About Taylor Swift’s Sexuality” and was written by Christian Williams. In the article, Williams suggests Swift may be queer and closeted while in a relationship with actor Joe Alwyn.
Swift’s Associates and Public Figures Condemn the Article
Shortly after the article’s publication, several of Swift’s close associates spoke out to condemn the piece as unethical and inappropriate.
A source described by TMZ as a “confidant” of Swift called the article “obscenely inappropriate,” saying “there seems to be no boundary some journalists won’t cross.”
Actress and Swift’s close friend Selena Gomez tweeted:
My friend’s personal life is no one’s business. This is awful.
Queer icon Elton John also criticized the article:
I’m appalled by the NYT’s decision to run this piece. Speculating about anyone’s sexuality against their will is unethical and cruel. We must give celebrities their privacy.
GLAAD President Sarah Kate Ellis stated the organization is “re-evaluating” its past recognition of the Times as an LGBTQ-friendly publication.
Even Chely Wright, the lesbian country singer referenced in the op-ed’s title, denounced the piece:
As a member of the LGBTQ community, I find this article unethical. Taylor’s fans seem to support her no matter what – the media should too.
Swift Fans Launch Viral Campaigns Against the Times
Swift’s loyal fanbase quickly launched viral social media campaigns taking aim at the Times for publishing the “cruel” and “voyeuristic” article.
The hashtag #NYTIsOverParty trended for over 24 hours on Twitter, while a Change.org petition calling for the op-ed to be retracted gained over 400,000 signatures.
Many fans argued the piece promotes harmful speculation and stereotyping around queer celebrities. TikTok user @taylorswift posted:
This op-ed is so damaging. Speculating about someone’s sexuality against their will is never okay. The New York Times should know better.
Some fans created edits of historic New York Times front pages with satirical headlines mocking the newspaper’s ethics. Fan @taylorshero13’s edit went viral, reading:
UNETHICAL PRACTICES AT THE NEW YORK TIMES: Twitter Responds to Our Regressive Views on Privacy Rights. We Messed Up.
A viral edit by a Swift fan of a satirical NYT front page by @taylorshero13 criticizing the outlet’s ethics
The New York Times Faces Backlash
By Monday January 8th, the New York Times had not directly responded to the criticism surrounding the article. As backlash mounted, other outlets published reports condemning the Times’ decision to print the piece.
The Hollywood Reporter wrote:
This op-ed never should have made it to print. The New York Times’ standards editors failed readers and Taylor Swift by allowing such a thoughtless invasion of privacy to be published under the guise of speculation.
Republic World published an opinion piece arguing:
This offering from the New York Times …raises pertinent questions about the publication’s editorial standards and ethics when it comes to celebrity privacy and reckless rumors.
Some reports suggested the Times may take disciplinary action against editorial leadership who approved publishing the piece.
Inside sources described mounting tensions within the Times and outrage spreading through the pop culture world.
What Happens Next?
It remains unclear how the New York Times will address the situation and calls to retract the article. Some PR experts argue the paper must take concrete accountability steps to reassure readers and advertisers around ethics.
However, Billboard wrote:
Knowing the Times, don’t expect a retraction or apology – but major changes in editorial standards could come.
Regardless, many feel permanent damage between Swift’s fandom and the press has already been done.
Buzzfeed wrote:
For Taylor Swift, this saga has broken the trust placed in even the most “reputable” of publications. Don’t expect her next album campaign to welcome the same media access.
While the outcome remains to be seen, the controversy has sparked a culture-wide reckoning around dangerous speculation surrounding queer celebrities based on harmful stereotypes.
To err is human, but AI does it too. Whilst factual data is used in the production of these articles, the content is written entirely by AI. Double check any facts you intend to rely on with another source.
